Blog

Greg Lee Greg Lee

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Voucher & Reliable Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Online

Now we can say that Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) exam questions are real and top-notch Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions that you can expect in the upcoming Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) exam. In this way, you can easily pass the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam with good scores. The countless Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam candidates have passed their dream Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certification exam and they all got help from real, valid, and updated Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate practice questions, You can also trust on PassSureExam and start preparation with confidence.

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Governance: Generative AI Engineers who take the exam get knowledge about masking techniques, guardrail techniques, and legal
licensing requirements in this topic.

Topic 2

Data Preparation: Generative AI Engineers covers a chunking strategy for a given document structure and model constraints. The topic also focuses on filter extraneous content in source documents. Lastly, Generative AI Engineers also learn about extracting document content from provided source data and format.

Topic 3

Evaluation and Monitoring: This topic is all about selecting an LLM choice and key metrics. Moreover, Generative AI Engineers learn about evaluating model performance. Lastly, the topic includes sub-topics about inference logging and usage of Databricks features.

>> Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Voucher <<

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Exam Sheets - Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Free Training & Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Study Review

PassSureExam provides numerous extra features to help you succeed on the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam, in addition to the Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions in PDF format and online practice test engine. These include 100% real questions and accurate answers, 1 year of free updates, a free demo of the Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Questions, a money-back guarantee in the event of failure, and a 20% discount. PassSureExam is the ideal alternative for your Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate test preparation because it combines all of these elements.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q19-Q24):

NEW QUESTION # 19
A Generative AI Engineer has been asked to build an LLM-based question-answering application. The application should take into account new documents that are frequently published. The engineer wants to build this application with the least cost and least development effort and have it operate at the lowest cost possible.
Which combination of chaining components and configuration meets these requirements?

A. The LLM needs to be frequently with the new documents in order to provide most up-to-date answers.
B. For the application a prompt, an agent and a fine-tuned LLM are required. The agent is used by the LLM to retrieve relevant content that is inserted into the prompt which is given to the LLM to generate answers.
C. For the question-answering application, prompt engineering and an LLM are required to generate answers.
D. For the application a prompt, a retriever, and an LLM are required. The retriever output is inserted into the prompt which is given to the LLM to generate answers.

Answer: D

Explanation:
Problem Context: The task is to build an LLM-based question-answering application that integrates new documents frequently with minimal costs and development efforts.
Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Utilizes a prompt and a retriever, with the retriever output being fed into the LLM. This setup is efficient because it dynamically updates the data pool via the retriever, allowing the LLM to provide up-to-date answers based on the latest documents without needing tofrequently retrain the model. This method offers a balance of cost-effectiveness and functionality.
* Option B: Requires frequent retraining of the LLM, which is costly and labor-intensive.
* Option C: Only involves prompt engineering and an LLM, which may not adequately handle the requirement for incorporating new documents unless it's part of an ongoing retraining or updating mechanism, which would increase costs.
* Option D: Involves an agent and a fine-tuned LLM, which could be overkill and lead to higher development and operational costs.
Option Ais the most suitable as it provides a cost-effective, minimal development approach while ensuring the application remains up-to-date with new information.

NEW QUESTION # 20
A Generative Al Engineer interfaces with an LLM with prompt/response behavior that has been trained on customer calls inquiring about product availability. The LLM is designed to output "In Stock" if the product is available or only the term "Out of Stock" if not.
Which prompt will work to allow the engineer to respond to call classification labels correctly?

A. Respond with "In Stock" if the customer asks for a product.
B. You will be given a customer call transcript where the customer inquires about product availability.Respond with "In Stock" if the product is available or "Out of Stock" if not.
C. Respond with "Out of Stock" if the customer asks for a product.
D. You will be given a customer call transcript where the customer asks about product availability. The outputs are either "In Stock" or "Out of Stock". Format the output in JSON, for example: {"call_id":
"123", "label": "In Stock"}.

Answer: D

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The Generative AI Engineer needs a prompt that will enable an LLM trained on customer call transcripts to classify and respond correctly regarding product availability. The desired response should clearly indicate whether a product is "In Stock" or "Out of Stock," and it should be formatted in a way that is structured and easy to parse programmatically, such as JSON.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Respond with "In Stock" if the customer asks for a product. This prompt is too generic and does not specify how to handle the case when a product is not available, nor does it provide a structured output format.
* Option B: This option is correctly formatted and explicit. It instructs the LLM to respond based on the availability mentioned in the customer call transcript and to format the response in JSON.
This structure allows for easy integration into systems that may need to process this information automatically, such as customer service dashboards or databases.
* Option C: Respond with "Out of Stock" if the customer asks for a product. Like option A, this prompt is also insufficient as it only covers the scenario where a product is unavailable and does not provide a structured output.
* Option D: While this prompt correctly specifies how to respond based on product availability, it lacks the structured output format, making it less suitable for systems that require formatted data for further processing.
Given the requirements for clear, programmatically usable outputs,Option Bis the optimal choice because it provides precise instructions on how to respond and includes a JSON format example for structuring the output, which is ideal for automated systems or further data handling.

NEW QUESTION # 21
Generative AI Engineer at an electronics company just deployed a RAG application for customers to ask questions about products that the company carries. However, they received feedback that the RAG response often returns information about an irrelevant product.
What can the engineer do to improve the relevance of the RAG's response?

A. Use a different LLM to improve the generated response
B. Implement caching for frequently asked questions
C. Assess the quality of the retrieved context
D. Use a different semantic similarity search algorithm

Answer: C

Explanation:
In a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system, the key to providing relevant responses lies in the quality of the retrieved context. Here's why option A is the most appropriate solution:
* Context Relevance:The RAG model generates answers based on retrieved documents or context. If the retrieved information is about an irrelevant product, it suggests that the retrieval step is failing to select the right context. The Generative AI Engineer must first assess the quality of what is being retrieved and ensure it is pertinent to the query.
* Vector Search and Embedding Similarity:RAG typically uses vector search for retrieval, where embeddings of the query are matched against embeddings of product descriptions. Assessing the semantic similarity searchprocess ensures that the closest matches are actually relevant to the query.
* Fine-tuning the Retrieval Process:By improving theretrieval quality, such as tuning the embeddings or adjusting the retrieval strategy, the system can return more accurate and relevant product information.
* Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* B (Caching FAQs): Caching can speed up responses for frequently asked questions but won't improve the relevance of the retrieved content for less frequent or new queries.
* C (Use a Different LLM): Changing the LLM only affects the generation step, not the retrieval process, which is the core issue here.
* D (Different Semantic Search Algorithm): This could help, but the first step is to evaluate the current retrieval context before replacing the search algorithm.
Therefore, improving and assessing the quality of the retrieved context (option A) is the first step to fixing the issue of irrelevant product information.

NEW QUESTION # 22
A Generative AI Engineer is designing an LLM-powered live sports commentary platform. The platform provides real-time updates and LLM-generated analyses for any users who would like to have live summaries, rather than reading a series of potentially outdated news articles.
Which tool below will give the platform access to real-time data for generating game analyses based on the latest game scores?

A. AutoML
B. Foundation Model APIs
C. Feature Serving
D. DatabrickslQ

Answer: C

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The engineer is developing an LLM-powered live sports commentary platform that needs to provide real-time updates and analyses based on the latest game scores. The critical requirement here is the capability to access and integrate real-time data efficiently with the platform for immediate analysis and reporting.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: DatabricksIQ: While DatabricksIQ offers integration and data processing capabilities, it is more aligned with data analytics rather than real-time feature serving, which is crucial for immediate updates necessary in a live sports commentary context.
* Option B: Foundation Model APIs: These APIs facilitate interactions with pre-trained models and could be part of the solution, but on their own, they do not provide mechanisms to access real- time game scores.
* Option C: Feature Serving: This is the correct answer as feature serving specifically refers to the real-time provision of data (features) to models for prediction. This would be essential for an LLM that generates analyses based on live game data, ensuring that the commentary is current and based on the latest events in the sport.
* Option D: AutoML: This tool automates the process of applying machine learning models to real-world problems, but it does not directly provide real-time data access, which is a critical requirement for the platform.
Thus,Option C(Feature Serving) is the most suitable tool for the platform as it directly supports the real-time data needs of an LLM-powered sports commentary system, ensuring that the analyses and updates are based on the latest available information.

NEW QUESTION # 23
A Generative Al Engineer has developed an LLM application to answer questions about internal company policies. The Generative AI Engineer must ensure that the application doesn't hallucinate or leak confidential data.
Which approach should NOT be used to mitigate hallucination or confidential data leakage?

A. Limit the data available based on the user's access level
B. Use a strong system prompt to ensure the model aligns with your needs.
C. Fine-tune the model on your data, hoping it will learn what is appropriate and not
D. Add guardrails to filter outputs from the LLM before it is shown to the user

Answer: C

Explanation:
When addressing concerns of hallucination and data leakage in an LLM application for internal company policies, fine-tuning the model on internal data with the hope it learns data boundaries can be problematic:
* Risk of Data Leakage: Fine-tuning on sensitive or confidential data does not guarantee that the model will not inadvertently include or reference this data in its outputs. There's a risk of overfitting to the specific data details, which might lead to unintended leakage.
* Hallucination: Fine-tuning does not necessarily mitigate the model's tendency to hallucinate; in fact, it might exacerbate it if the training data is not comprehensive or representative of all potential queries.
Better Approaches:
* A,C, andDinvolve setting up operational safeguards and constraints that directly address data leakage and ensure responses are aligned with specific user needs and security levels.
Fine-tuning lacks the targeted control needed for such sensitive applications and can introduce new risks, making it an unsuitable approach in this context.

NEW QUESTION # 24
......

Our PassSureExam aims at helping you reward your efforts on preparing for Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam. If you don't believe it, you can try our product demo first; after you download and check our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate free demo, you will find how careful and professional our Research and Development teams are. If you are still preparing for other IT certification exams except Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam, you can also find the related exam dumps you want in our huge dumps and study materials.

Reliable Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Online: https://www.passsureexam.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-pass4sure-exam-dumps.html

Cookie	Duration	Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional	11 months	The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy	11 months	The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.

Greg Lee Greg Lee

Biography

COOKIE NOTICE